Originally Posted by
tsquare
...The first part of your post seemed to me to be a bit of Obomaesque pie in the sky hopey changey rhetoric...
I don't know what level of reading comprehension skills you have, but when I read the first part of Jesse's post:
You're assuming your present bargaining agent is going to get the most the company is willing to agree to, which I don't consider a given. Explain to me why that is not a possibility.
The thing I get from Jesse's post is that Jesse has little confidence in the ability of the current bargaining agent to deliver the best that can be done.
What makes you think that Jesse's lack of confidence in the current bargaining agent's ability to deliver the best possible outcome is in any way less valid a point than your similar sentiments towards the current administrations ability for the country?
That seems like a logical short circuit to me...Unless your definition of best possible outcome differs greatly from that of Jesse's.
Cheers
George