Line building can only do that if company builds lines that workout perfectly. ASA PBS system lets ALL pilots senior AND jr do that. But that is just one example of our PBS system. Over all the system is good but I admit we can use some improvement. Not so much in the PBS program but in what company can and can't do. To be fair an example is flying extra on a vacation month. If we are awarded below guarantee and pick up stuff it's not added on top like you guys. Which I think is BS and why we don't pick up open time on vacation months. It's not a perfect system but for now with all the options out there currently in use, I think our system is one of the better ones. I tell xjet pilots that ask me about it in ORD to not judge and just wait till it goes on the roadshow and see for yourself. Hear what we pilots currently using have to say and look at it. Hear the flaws hear the good and test it. I was against it at 1st but it ended up creating more lines. Also after the roadshow see how it works out when you guy run a few months bidding PBS along with line bidding. That is when most of us saw the difference. If we are lucky the new ASA XJET MEC will get many of the flaws out by then. I will say if it goes to arbitration I think we ALL will lose and company will win. Lately it seems like it always goes their way in arbitration. So if company really wants it we may not be able to stop it. And like I said, it's not that bad. For us it was better. Many senior guys hate it due to crappy pairings. Our PBS system doesnt create parings. It's a bad misunderstanding in our part and it leads to misguided options about our PBS. I agree our pairings sometimes... many times stink and it seems like company and ALPA is working on that. Our system can only build trips with pairings that COMPANY dumps into it. Blah blah blah..... Again, if you read all this just wait till roadshow and ask questions, dont assume.