Originally Posted by
USMC3197
Skywest Inc did, which means ASA did. Get over it. Your management got their golden parachute at your employees expense.
Sorry it's come to this, but there's a few things you need to "get over", or just simply educate yourself on;
You don't know much about the line bid work rules at XJT, as evidenced by one of your posts.
You don't know the difference between a system limitation vs. a work rule limitation, as evidenced by a post of yours.
You aren't that aware of what ACTUALLY want down on the buyout, as evidenced by a post of yours.
You seem to think that XJt could get sold off due to failure to reach an agreement, as evidenced by a post of yours. You DO know that SOC status has been achieved, right? Meaning they can't just auction off the ERJ side wholesale, to whomever would want to buy it. Never mind the FACT that Jerry would have to clear it with mamma CALNITED since they lease the airplanes, THEN sublease to SkyWest holdings.
Originally Posted by
USMC3197
I'm trying to stick with the subjects associated with PBS, so QOL issues directly revolved with PBS. Though yes we did go off topic a few times. I cannot debate over the whole contract because I dont know it well enough. But our joint MECs are supposed to negotiating that was we speak.
Well then stick to it if you want me to take you serious. Picking up over vacation has NOTHING to do with PBS. it's purely a contactual language/QOL item.
Originally Posted by
USMC3197
If I worded it poorly then it was my error but I was referring to you guys before you were sold off.
Understood, but I referring to the PRESENT. Based on your statement "failure to reach an agreement".
Originally Posted by
USMC3197
Questions that some would ask is did they sign it to just sell you off? Pinnacle signed theirs and months later they are now asking for concessions and are in bankruptcy. Are these signings all just dirty tactics?
When you refer to signings, what EXACTLY are you referring to? Contract 04 was signed in an ENTIRELY different time/landscape. It was done under a "cost+10%" arrangement that dates back to the COEX/IPO sell off that was driven by a pump and dump wall street move. Concession 08 (LOA 9) was supposed to bring "XJT back to profitability" although it was a "cost neutral" CPA. As well as the FACT that those operating rates were based more on what Jerry told CAL that XJT could be operated under, NOT what they were ACTUALLY operating at.