Originally Posted by
Gearjerk
Why do you think that Management wants D-ALPA to succeed vs. DPA? DAL88 you're smarter than that question.
BECAUSE THEY HAVE A CONSTRUCTIVE ENGAGEMENT "RAPPORT" with D-ALPA. You know, the same constructive engagement, outside of Section 6 negotiations mind you, that gave YOU & CARL & EVERYONE ELSE ON THE SENIORITY LIST, the Scheduling Optimization Team (SOT), the change in reserve rules, the changes in 23K.
You mean the same "constructive engagement rapport" that had us cave in on more 76 seaters? Or the "constructive engagement rapport" that had us NOT grieve the RAH scope violation because management successfully found a loophole in our scope language? What kind of thing was that for management to do to their "constructive engagement" partner? Or maybe you mean the "constructive engagement rapport" that now has management fighting to pull out crew rest areas on the A330?
Carl