Originally Posted by
USN C9B
You are right CRJ, that was in SLI 1. BUT...FF was talking about arbitration. I doubt that furloughs would've been addressed in arby..it might have but I doubt it. The governing document would've been the process agreement between SWAPA and SWA. IIRC, the furloughs go AT first then SWA. I was and still not wrong.
C9
I can't imagine an arbitrated settlement with no mention of furloughs. If nothing else it would have said the current SWAPA CBA language would be applied, which I can assure you does not have a provision for ANY furloughs out of seniority order.