View Single Post
Old 03-08-2012 | 03:15 AM
  #92047  
acl65pilot's Avatar
acl65pilot
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
None of this was Bacon's question. He wanted to know if DALPA could do it. And I've said they absolutely could if it's prior to Section 6, and after Section 6 if they decide to amend the policy manual.

If you disagree, please post the policy manual section that prohibits DALPA from signing off on it prior to Section 6.

Carl
Yes Carl they can. They can send anything outside of Section 6 to a vote or not. They via the policy manual can do what you state. If it is significant they are to send it to memrat, but you have a point. LOA 29 was huge and they did not even vote whether or not they wanted it to send it to MEMRAT. They discussed it briefly but never voted on it, and all of the these scheduling changes that we are now seeing, which were apparently from pilot input were TAed and ratified by only the reps. Same could happen here with a modification or extension.

I put forth a resolution last year that failed at the LEC level that worked to change this. Another pilot wrote another resolution at the next meeting and that one failed at the LEC level.

My point of the last posts on this subject was, they will not leave this on their shoulders. If they do, and it is anything short of full restoration, they will be overcome by events. I think they are aware of it.

In the end you are right and Bacon is right. They can. Sailing is correct that they will not. It would be downright stupid to do so, and I would not be surprised to see a few reps resign if they did.