Quote:
If the company wants to pay anyone more than they are entitled to, let them. It's not going to have any influence on contract negotiations. Most the the union are lifer captains anyways who don't give a crap about FO's.
Are you talking about the PNCL union or RAH union? I am sure you don't know that our union has a good FO representation, with the chair being a FO as well. Originally Posted by 9easy
This happened at Pinnacle, except the union rejected it, and it created an enormous amount of bad feelings towards the union.If the company wants to pay anyone more than they are entitled to, let them. It's not going to have any influence on contract negotiations. Most the the union are lifer captains anyways who don't give a crap about FO's.
This new proposal could be presented to the vote as an LOA and can be made effective certain date. As long as LOA language is right, I'd vote YES to it..