View Single Post
Old 03-13-2012 | 05:04 AM
  #92586  
forgot to bid's Avatar
forgot to bid
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
The arguement for SWA's shortcall and greater days off should not be done in a vacume. If the arguement is FOR the whole SWA contract, there goes along with it other "benefits" like premium pay out of some open time, higher credit for days, fewer plane changes, reserve access to open time, etc. SWA PAYS for efficiency.

There is no arguement FOR 14 days of shortcall without the rest of the package - including their scope clause.

As has been pointed out, DAL reserve can be pretty painful if the category is shortmanned. If you haven't experienced that, you will at some point if you are on reserve. DAL can make it so you get NO days on the lake except your laundry days between trip pieces while you dont break guarantee.
that's a good point, it has to be all of the above if at all.

And if that happens, then the scope clause has to come with it. It's a nonstarter if it doesn't. And I don't mean a take back or % reduction in DCI, I mean SWA scope.

0 outsourcing.

so while yes we would be incredibly overstaffed with the new rules, maybe the new flying would take care of that to the positive.

Last edited by forgot to bid; 03-13-2012 at 05:28 AM.