View Single Post
Old 03-14-2012 | 03:13 PM
  #92828  
acl65pilot's Avatar
acl65pilot
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by vprMatrix
ACL,

I read " Improve balance of flying between Delta and DCI" as a way of saying we want to lock the (current?) ASM ratio between Delta and DCI. This might work if Alpa is seeking a large cut in current DCI flying but my guess is they won't. Worse, I bet that alpa will put in a one way valve were DCI can grow but doesn't have to shrink when mainline does.

Hope I'm wrong but there were enough specifics in other sections that section 1 has left me underwhelmed . Also, I can't tell your tone but why is a sunset clause a fantasy? Even if we just half the 255 large RJs, sunsetting seems like a good way of taking the sting out of RJ reductions.

Vpr

The language is not my favorite but lacks the specifics. Therefore I will wait and see what the finished product looks like. I suspected Section 1 would be vague for obvious reasons. It really is simple, if it does not meet the minimums required, the TA as a whole gets a no vote.