Originally Posted by
FIIGMO
Also, my issue is with any mention of any DCI carrier or crew member getting any consideration at DAL at all whether scope, hiring, pass benefits anything.
I agree with you. It's more proof that the regional MEC's and ALPA national had a hand in writing our Section 1 opener. This should come as no surprise. The Ford-Cooksey lawsuit settlement requires it, and Moak's first letter to us after being elected president said: 'We will use all the tools at our disposal to ensure contracts are not self-interested, but rather reflect what is best for the entire industry as a whole'.
Originally Posted by
FIIGMO
JV and code share needs to be addressed in much stronger language. Alaska code share has decimated QOL of every pilot at DAL especially west coast crews. Absolute hard limit language on scope and no more scope concession period.
But that didn't happen FIIGMO. Now what?
Originally Posted by
FIIGMO
DPA is not even in the equation at all. They are not here now, maybe we will see but any comparison to what DPA would do is pure fantasy and frankly irritating.
I never mentioned or even hinted at DPA in any part of my post. Why be irritated about something I never said?
Carl