View Single Post
Old 03-20-2012 | 01:15 PM
  #93417  
Scoop
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

Gloopy,

Touche' - I'm with ya. My whole point on the 3-1 was that if we must have it in there then lets modify it to our benefit.

I am a 100% no vote on any Scope relaxation. As for the Battlestar - it would have to depend on what the crew rest facility was like.

Scoop



Originally Posted by gloopy


Watchu talkin bout Scoop?

I wouldn't give them 3 more RJ's for every one of these:



If they need more large RJ's, they can have more RJ's. As many as they want, for whatever routes they want. We just have to be the ones flying them.

Now I'm a reasonable guy. Maybe I will agree to allow them to keep one existing outsourced large RJ for every two that are parked in addition to every new 777 or 747 (pax or freighter) that is added to the fleet.

And yes, I do believe that is an oil painting.

And since the page is already stretched now, someone might as well post a jumbo pic of the Fly Delta Jets sign with a conga line of RJ's, some underboob or cats.