Originally Posted by
johnso29
The problem with your solution is defining 'fair'.
All I ever wanted wanted in this integration was to end up in the same relative place at retirement as I would without the merger. That's what I ended up getting. Due to the younger age of the AT group I ended up with a single digit bump in seniority now which erodes to zero at retirement. I feel that that was fair to me and my expectations. I can't speak to what the others involved expected or considered as fair. Fair to one is a gross injustice to another.