Originally Posted by Mulva

RAHContractNow.org did not go over particularly well with many of us here at Frontier. IBT357 can do whatever they feel they need to in order to achieve their objectives. Bringing the reputation of those who feed you (United and USAirways), and those who suckle from your teat (Frontier), by using unauthorized images on a website in direct violation of the RAH and Frontier company policy manual tends to ruffle feathers. Especially, when the message of the site is obviously intended to damage the Company.

For reference:



Frontier pilots are not behind this lawsuit. The Company is full of grown up people who are smart enough to know when they can legitimately call BS on an effort the uses livery images without permission and in direct violation of the policy manual. I'm sure that some Frontier pilots voiced their opinions to management via email, phone calls or in person. IBT representation does not restrain individual pilots from walking in to the GO and voicing an opinion.

I sent an email to the Company about RAHContractNow because I don't like when non-Frontier issues damage the reputation of the company I work for. First we have a drunk CHQ pilot whom 99% of the media portrays a drunk Frontier pilot showing up to work to fly a Frontier flight. Then a militant website arises incorporating images of IBT followers, aircraft in United, USAirways and Frontier livery. I wouldn't be surprised if United and USAirways also come after the IBT on this one.