Dude. You are an i***t! (Please, Mr. Moderator give me a mulligan on that one).

I am not management. I do own my own business and I have plenty of experience at a Fortune 500 company in a prior life, but right now I am nothing more than a pilot with an opinion as, I believe, you are too.

Why bring scope into the equation? How does it apply in a discussion about a website set up to harm the company which includes images in violation of company policy that all employees are required to abide by? Maybe you are saying that by allowing 190 size aircraft to fly under contract with F9 livery, we somehow hurt the reputation of the company?

I would argue that you are correct since those airplanes are being flown by an entirely separate company whose pilots are blindly following their union and appear ready to burn the house down to get what they want. Those efforts include bringing the Frontier name into potential bad light with the public, especially when IBT is advertizing the RAHContractNow site on other independent websites such as APC.

Every day that passes that we are still associated with RAH hurts the reputation of Frontier. Especially, when the general public (and media) is incapable of discerning the difference between Frontier Airlines and a company who contracts to fly for Frontier.

So Embraerjetpilot, go back in your hole and search for something useful to bring to the conversation.