View Single Post
Old 03-30-2012 | 05:23 PM
  #94270  
Flamer's Avatar
Flamer
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 3
From: Lowest Pay I Could Find
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
Is all of Section 1 part of your math when considering the gain or loss in scope?

Currently DAL has unlimited off-list:
50 and below jets
70 and below turboprops
JV flying (except with Skyteam transatlantic)
Alaska Codeshare and other international codeshare

AND 255 off-list 51-76 jets.

Would would you agree or disagree that it would be a gain or loss in scope if:

Capped and PERMANENTLY reduced (over a set timeframe) all 50 seat jets and no renewal permitted off-list

0 off-list future turborprop flying

ALL JV flying required to be 50% DAL pilot EASK's/block hours/whatever metric), lookback average returned to 1 year instead of 3, with monthly financial penalties paid to the Delta Pilots when out of compliance.

ALL codehares have time limits or cutoff points if the codeshare is a revenue deal

Alaska codeshare is limited/reduced over time/ sunsetted completely.

DAL can operate 1 more 51-76 seat RJ's off-list for every 2.5 50 seat jets that are removed from service, up to a limit of X airframes (say 50-100)?


Is it a gain or loss....

***DISCLAIMER***The above is NOT anyone's scope proposal(mine, company, or union), just a hypothetical question.

Gotta go, I'll be interested to see what guys think later.
That's a loss. History has shown that an overly complex scope section holds water like Swiss cheese. Keep it simple. Fancy plans like that never survive first contact with real lawyers.