Originally Posted by
DAWGS
Trying to smear someone who doesn't share your views is professional? BTW, been around since 07 on this board with only 170 posts. I'm not selling anything. Most of my posts occur when I can no longer bite my fingers. You on the other hand have only been here since Jun 09. You have 1761 posts. It seems you are the junior one around here and very clearly here for a purpose, which imo, is to manage expectations for ALPA. I certainly have had my doubts about ALPA. I have been willing as of late to get behind them, however I must admit being smeared by an insider, continues to add to my distrust of the very people who are supposed to represent me.
Many of my 1,700 posts have been spent needlessly on this DPA stuff, when my interest is actually moving forward. It had finally (and mercifully) stopped when the grown-ups created a venue for the "ALPA/DPA" afficionados. You'll note I frequent that thread very little, because I'm not interested in it. If I were so "establishment", I'd be all over it.
To call you a salesman is not to smear: that is the essence of your posts. It's the opposite of what I do: I adress the DPA stuff only when it's put in my face constantly on the L&G, and you're busy
making sure it's on the L&G.
I don't pray at ALPA's temple, and I'm not a choir boy. I'd argue that I object to getting old ALPA insiders repackaged in DPA, and I object to the constant attacks on our union, especially now. I do nothing with your expectations, I only express my opinion. You may argue that I'm defending ALPA, but you can't possibly back up your claim that I'm an "insider". Speaking of smearing.