Originally Posted by tsquare

I agree that it needs tightening. It is going to depend on the price as to whether "reversing" it is palatable or not. As a matter of fact, in some of mine I have probably illustrated more of the shortcomings of some of the language than many care to recognize.. And never in any of my posts have I said otherwise. I just said that it is in fact negotiable, and that "not quack quack quack " is NOT a strategy.