Originally Posted by
Free Bird
My bad, I worded that poorly. If DALPA put forth a TA with any more scope relaxation etc.
In regards to your previous post. Any rep that would for any reason vote yes on a TA that would give up more scope should state as much publicly.
Of course that will never happen as they would more than likely be re-called.
I doubt any rep would discuss negotiating positions, whatever they are, during negotiations. That's like showing your cards. It's only when the TA comes out and all the cards are on the table that we'll be able to make a reasoned judgment.
It'll be interesting to see which reps stand behind the negotiators and which don't. I remember all the fuss about whether we should even have a negotiator election. Some reps went way out on a limb to keep these guys at the table.