Originally Posted by
Jughead
I'd be OK with my current 88A rate, as long as I could fly with the doors off, and had no legs longer than KATL-KMCN. Avionics are compatible with current MD88 config, so little transition training is required:
However, the Cub NG would require 73N pay, and I'd be willing to stretch the leg out to Valdosta.
An airplane like that... with avionics like ^^^^ is just wrong.