View Single Post
Old 04-16-2012, 06:56 AM
  #95857  
tsquare
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Jughead View Post
I'd be OK with my current 88A rate, as long as I could fly with the doors off, and had no legs longer than KATL-KMCN. Avionics are compatible with current MD88 config, so little transition training is required:



However, the Cub NG would require 73N pay, and I'd be willing to stretch the leg out to Valdosta.

An airplane like that... with avionics like ^^^^ is just wrong.
tsquare is offline