View Single Post
Old 04-18-2012 | 08:30 AM
  #76  
Lerxst's Avatar
Lerxst
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 735
Likes: 0
From: B787 CA - SFO
Default

Originally Posted by LeeMat
Hi, I have not seen the language/details of the Grievance filed but I claim ignorance on my part..I thought the grievances were filed against the UCH not CAL ALPA. Also grievances are not law suits...Again I am not up to speed on the status of the grievance but I will ask our local grievance chair for an update.
Hi Lee, you're right in that a grievance is not a lawsuit, but the underlying concept is still the same. They do have a grievance against both UCH for the failure to conform to your contractual profit sharing formula, and against CAL ALPA for status quo violations around the profit sharing.

Upon reflecting on this issue I have changed my view on its importance. It is a cop out for the CAL MC to use this as an excuse to sever ties. Professionals get the job done, period.

As I stated in my post above this, I have to question the motives of our MC and his supporters in the MEC. Friday, imho, will demonstrate if we are the cowboys or the Indians based on what direction our MEC decides to jump.
Reply