Originally Posted by
Ottolillienthal
The first sentenance above is golden. It is an absolute truth sandwich. Everyone needs to embrace that to get over the jeaolousy and envy.
I would offer this bit of hope though. I feel it is faster for us all to get a JCBA with 2 seperate deals. It would be easier to get both MEC's to the table if both pilot groups weren't so far apart on major issues.
Why not go two seperate CBA's for a short term deal to bring each group up to relative pairity and then pursue a JCBA with both groups. It might be faster for the pilots and more efficient for ALPA National to pull off, and it might actually create some unity and some momentum to build on moving forward.
Who the hell are you?! Faster to get a JCBA with 2 separate deals?? Whatever trial balloon you're floating is going down like the Hindenburg.
Do you REALLY think the delay in getting a JCBA is caused by the UAL and CAL pilots being 'far apart' on issues??? Again...who the hell are you? I ask that question honestly. You suddenly pop up on the forum and post this kind of divisive nonsense and you expect to get taken seriously? I mean, come on, what the heck does 'relative parity' even mean?? And how would that be more efficient for ALPA National to 'pull off'?? And to top that off, you claim that it would create unity???!!!!
You've can't be for real.