Originally Posted by Sink r8

Seems like a good thing, to T/A what the membership wants. Of course, that depends on how fair the polling is. My experienced has been mixed in this regard, not so much at Delta, but Age 65 comes to mind.



Why do you think that is (the sales job)? They're that proud of the product that they just slowly take ownership of it, like a proud parent that just cut the umbillical cord? I've never understood it. The product should speak for itself. I don't even see the point in an "official" pro-con paper.

I suppose the reps can't simply disappear when a T/A is reached. People have questions/comments. So I suppose that, by default, they argue in favor of something they just voted to pass on to the membership.

Still, my experience has been that there is always a strong, obvious commitment to getting a T/A passed. Why is that necessary?