View Single Post
Old 04-25-2012 | 07:45 PM
  #66  
Slammer
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: EWR B737FO
Default

Originally Posted by LeeFXDWG
Slammer,

Now remember, I'm going from the updates I receive on the UAL side and some that I read about from the CAL side on the forum. Never read the mid-June timeline anywhere. Then again, I could have missed it.

Other than the various timeframes mentioned during the course of the process, I can say that mid-June wasn't mentioned in a UAL update that I read. Again, if you can point me to it. Great. I'll stand corrected.

All the protocols, implied promises, or whatever aside, no one was blind sided IMO. And, to be honest, you do know that the request for release from either/both sides will be funneled through Nat'l to the NMB. You are aware that Moak will have to sign off on and present the request?

Blind sided would probably more relate to the PS issue as a one sided, albeit legal, approach.

Not trying to pick a fight my brother. Just laying out the facts regarding the information I have been given and what has transpired to date.



Besides, if one were to believe in MEC released timelines.....there would have been a JCBA in Oct 2010............

Frats,
Lee

Lee,

We can disagree and not be ass xxxxs. Appreciate your tone and i will reciprocate in- kind. The mid June timeline and agreement to complete a TA was in last weeks MEC weekly position report to CAL pilots. The first paragraph discusses the agreement and timeline and players in the room. It was also reiterated during a pilot conference call just two days ago..so that's what our side is getting. I talked today with 2 reps and they confirmed the agreements.

That said, I'm sure the truth about all that was agreed too or not is somewhere in the middle. I just can't understand why JH did not coordinate with our side? Have you guys gotten any insight from your reps.
Reply