Originally Posted by
gloopy
we could allow 9 76 seaters for every 10 50 seaters parked and that would fulfill that "production balance" talking point 100%.
Before the argument starts, my post above is not meant to endorse this sort of trade. I'd consider the package, but the numbers you describe are obscene. I agree they could fit between the lines, but so could a handful of airplanes. I'd have to see numbers.
Then there was the veiled threat of you really need to vote for what we bring you cause if you don't it'll be many years before you get any raise
We need to vote for whatever meets our own individual requirements. I hope you're right, and this thing isn't marketed that way. I hope it's not marketed at all. We all understand TVM, but we also know that you can't maintain any dignity or credibility if you always yield to fear.