Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
Carl, you are one funny man. I am sure that you threat asses everything out.
I had to read that a couple of times to decipher it. You must mean assess.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
The threat of JV's are real. The threat to the NRT hub is real. You can minimize the shortcomings in Section 1 all you want, but that does not diminish them.
There is not a single word in my posts that minimizes the pathetically weak language in our Section 1. That is NOT the point at all. The point
is that our pathetically weak language allows the company to JV the whole damn thing out if they wished. The point
is also that management chooses NOT to do that. Due to their fiduciary responsibilites, we MUST conclude that more JV's/code share does not mean more profitability for DAL. Otherwise management would be operating that way.
Now you have to ask yourself why is
management the one asking for early openers and a quick deal? If all the threats that you and I see in our pathetically weak Scope language was ammo that management actually planned to use, management would want this current language to stay as long as possible. Instead, they're apparently asking for changes to allow more 76 seat flying. Why do you think that is?
Carl