Originally Posted by
horrido27
Regular Guy-
A couple of questions..
You wrote The meeting won't happen because JP required the UAL MEC to drop its grievance on the PS as a requirement.
from the other blog:
"I asked my rep if a condition of meeting was that we drop our PS grievance. He said that was true and the LUAL MEC said NFW!"
Is that coming from a UAL Rep or a CAL Rep? I have not heard that and if that is true, I will question Jay P at the next LEC meeting on that! It's BS as your Grievance is against the company, not the CAL MEC.
And it was also my understanding that the Grievance was also about the amount of your payout.. if I'm correct. If not, please correct me.
Motch
Motch,
When JP is pressed about the UAL MEC grievance and the TPA legal action, and why those events are an obstacle to him and the CAL MEC attending a joint meeting, he will tell you that it is based on legal advice that he has received.
(He was asked at a UAL FamAware event and this was the answer he gave.)
I believe JP does not want the full truth of his negotiations in regards to the CAL profit sharing agreement to come out.
Hog