View Single Post
Old 05-03-2012 | 03:59 AM
  #97671  
acl65pilot's Avatar
acl65pilot
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Good post, Scoop.

I think we're all getting the same feedback, so we know what they're going after, both the NC and the company. We can judge the results when/if there is a T/A.

I do want to make one observation, and I think it's an important concept. Let me see if I can develop it like this:

1) It's not just important what we say on the forum, but what we do.
2) We step up to say we'll vote down a contract that's not satisfactory, and this is good. But we're also tripping over ourselves over rumors, and showing eagerness for a T/A. APC right now is just humming along, powered by eager Delta pilots. That sends a message too.
3) Many of us, including me, are now showing a willingness to look at the T/A, with Section 1 taken in it's entirety. This opens the door for a deal further. Maybe they're now negotiating over a couple of jets here and there, or a % of pay, or an hour of vacation... you get my drift: maybe the whole thing is down to going a little this way, or a little that way.
4) [B]The more anxious we act (not talk), the less management feels they have to yield to get us there, the less leverage our guys have to go just a little further.
5) The more patient we act (not talk), the more management feels they have to give to get us there, the more leverage our guys have to go just a little further.

So think about this, as we perhaps approach the finish line (I'm not playing coy here.... I don't know either):

Patience and discipline might get us more. Patience and discipline might yield 1% extra, might yield 25 less 76-seat jets, might yield a better sick policy... whatever. And that little bit of patience now will pay back dividends every year.

At this point, your target audience is no longer other pilots. We don't have to convince each other of how to vote on a T/A yet, and to influence a T/A, we should be talking to our reps, not just this APC closed loop. This is mostly about showing discipline, as the NC determines whether they can wrap this up properly, or not. This is the time to provide them with just a little extra leverage, IMO.

I'm for one am going to try to put my words where my mouth is, and step back. I'm not a patient man at heart, but I can learn if there is a payoff.
SInk;
That is a good point.

Something I also get, and I am sure the company is getting off of these boards (which they read daily) is that guys are not going to accept something that they do not want. Scope, pay et al all has to be on a level at or above what a full section 6 would yield. That comes though. Even those of us that are willing to wait to see the TA and the actual language before grabbing a pitch fork, have the same mindset; "Give us what we deserve and don't play games." If that is in fact how this goes down, it will go quickly and quietly. If not,.......

*I see no pressure within the MEC or the pilot group as a whole to agree to substandard terms. I do see an eagerness to return to greatness, but not at an unacceptable cost.