View Single Post
Old 05-06-2012 | 02:38 AM
  #7  
block30's Avatar
block30
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
Talk with an AME and see just how many pilots can't really pass the given test. If really enforced to the "T", I don't think at least half of the male pilot population would ever get their medical, at least based on what my AME has told me. Supposedly I have some red/green deficiency. I've always been able to pass the test or do "well enough", but some of the numbers I just can't see (and yes, I know there are sometimes ones with nothing/if you see something it's wrong). I can always see the different colors, but sometimes I have to "trace it out" to get to the right one, which seems odd, but I don't know if they're supposed to be more distinctive or what. With a variety of other tests (alternative test in the Army) I've done fine, and I've never had any problems in real life discerning between reds and greens, but I just think the current test is ridiculous, and there is a lot of criticism of it for other reasons (inconsistent due to lighting levels, types of lighting, etc) . It's ridiculous because most people tend to agree that the level of color definition required by the test is not required for anything a pilot does.
I am in the same boat as James. The trouble with Ishihara plates is that they screen for for "perfect" color vision....something like saying your acuity is either 20/20 or you are legally blind. No, there are variations of acuity, just like color deficiency. Plus other confounds in the system; any AME I have gone to so far I an barely pass their Ishihara plates, but when I went to an eye doctor I got almost all correct, and I believe he had 1. the correct bulb 2. a non faded color plate book 3. turned off the room lights.
Reply