Originally Posted by
Enterprise
Why don't you go write a follow up article for Manno's masterpiece. You can tell the world how smart you guys are and how stupid everyone else is. Amazing how everyone else can have it so wrong and not see how sticking with this failed management team and getting raped by their term sheets are "in our best interest".
It's interesting he clings so tightly to it, yet 3 times I've asked him to explain its benefits to us vs. what U might offer and 3 times the crickets chirped loudly. If the answer is that there is no firm information to compare yet, then one would think the only real data you have to evaluate Horton's future plan vs. Parker's is on past performance. Putting the last decade of that back-to-back clearly puts Parker in the "least risk" catagory, if you ask me.
Soon, Parker is likely to reveal his specific plan, but AMR's seems to remain mostly "confidential". What IS known so far hasn't impressed anyone except a specific few, Tomahawk apparently being one.