Originally Posted by
scambo1
I will make a blanket statement with the full knowledge and understanding that I am tied to DAL:
If the TA takes the approach that it is our job to fix the companies looming training problem (due to retirements) by either longevity pay or extreme paybanding; promises of growth for lower pay increases (a B-scale by another name), growth of outsourcing, or any other "fix" the companies problem...I am a no.
I agree, and should have been more specific. I don't understand why people make assumptions from the NNP. And this is not directed at you scambo. Does it not lack detail? Do we know for certain that reserves can be down to 99 hours a month? I misinterpreted the 3:1 ratio and 255 cap. I think some still do.
My point being, some on this forum have already made a decision on how they will vote, and we don't even have a TA yet. Seems premature to me. JMHO.