View Single Post
Old 05-13-2012 | 08:43 PM
  #99052  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Carl Spackler
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Cogf16
Alright Carl, I'll take a shot at this....

Let's assume the company wants to dump a lot of 50 seaters. These jets are replaced by SOME more 76 seaters and 717/319's. The net result is DCI block hours reduce moderately and ML block hours go up moderately We get ironclad language protecting us from furlough in regards to parking those extra jets, removing seats or flow down (if we choose) Finally, assume we don't cave at a later date with an LOA or concession to remove some of these key restrictions. Is this a bad deal if DCI shrinks and ML grows? Remember these 76 seaters are already at DCI. I don't think we'd be setting any precedence that could be used against us in the future.
Most of this I already discussed in the post above, but I had to red highlight this. Even the most stalwart ALPA supporters admit our Section 1 is riddled with holes. Do you remember who wrote and agreed to that language? Now you're asking those same people to write you more "ironclad language?" ALPA attorneys cannot write ironclad language...even if they knew how..

Carl