Originally Posted by
WideRide
They could have started by not ratifying a crap TA (which we don't even get to see yet since the spin-machine isn't properly spun yet) and wasting our time on a vote.
What part of PAY and SCOPE did ALPA not hear in our survey results?
And that will make it better... how? It really comes down to the basic assumption that the negotiators are incompetent. That is the DPA perspective. Interestingly enough, they (DPA) have proven NOTHING about their abilities. And with that in mind,you would rather buy a pig in a poke, than go with something that is tested. I definitely do not want to go down the APA road.. do you?
Again, don't get me wrong, I am not happy with the rumors I am hearing, and I have emailed my reps saying just that very thing. But bloviating about how DPA will do better is like a blind white slip. You can't be angry when you get that uncommutable MEX trip. If we vote them in.. it is a bind WS. I do not think the risk is worth the gain.