Caution! the following is a rant that nobody ('cept maybe grammar hawks and lawyer-language-haters) cares about, nor should you. I refer you to my disclaimer at the end of my previous post.

Why the hockey-sticks (no offense, Hockey) did we line out six lines about paint except the word "aircraft", then add a "No" in front of it and then many lines later finish the sentence with "will be flown by less than 2 pilots" instead of just lining out the whole thing and writing the new sentence so that it could be easily read in one place? Is there some secret handshake about not wasting any words that can be reused?

And if so, shouldn't we have re-used the word "in" in section 1 d 8 b 1) ? Although we would have had to capitalize it, so maybe not ...

Nevermind, rant over.

Maybe I should try to read the rest of it tomorrow.