View Single Post
Old 05-22-2012 | 03:36 AM
  #100442  
scambo1's Avatar
scambo1
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Bombardier is more than willing to eat 50-seater contracts if new 76-seaters are ordered. The sticking point is our contract permitting only 153 76-seat RJs.

Certainly that was worth money for the company to eliminate a loss-leading fleet and replace it with a newer more cost effective fleet.

Somehow our NC was unable to monetize the financial benefit to the company in a way that adds to a contract that was promised as "leading the industry." Because well before the RJ deal that was what TO promised to deliver to the Delta pilots.

The early opener, quick contract and scope relief should have returned some value on top of an industry-leading contract. The TA presented doesn't reflect the added value of industry-leading plus.

Cheers
George

And this is why the TA should never have left the MEC.

But since it did, it should get voted down and the DPA will be given another chance.

If there has ever been a more EPIC FAILURE by Dalpa, I am not aware of it. Walking away from the table is an option.