I still can’t get past section one. The fifty seaters are inefficient and are going to be parked one way or another. So we are going to help them do this by allowing a bunch more 76 seaters to replace them. Oh but the company is going to commit to getting a narrowbody aircraft. Guess what, they were already going to get these anyway. They needed to fill the gap between the MD-88 and 76 seaters anyways. So we are helping them park planes that will be parked anyway in exchange for planes that they were going to be bought anyways plus selling out on scope. WTH!! Offering early outs now and not with the rest of the company. Reducing capacity, no movement, and backward career progression the last few years hoping to leverage all that now. Guys I feel we are being played like a fiddle here and I am ****ed. So how much would it cost to cancel the 50 seat contracts and park them. That amount should be subtracted from the total cost they say this contract is worth. I bet it would end up showing a concessionary contract. Just saying with the amount of cooperation we are giving here we sure didn’t get much in return.