Originally Posted by
thomas39
For me I don't need to read a single sentence past 4,8.5,3,3 especially when we loose profit sharing. Its just that simple.
I absolutely get that. But if we send it back (and we should) the next step will be telling them why. If we just say pay wasn't enough, they will come back with another TA with the pay (rates) that will pass. But its how they will get there (more work rule concessions, more scope concessions, even more favorable language, even less profit sharing, etc).
At the very least they need to know all the areas they screwed up and that we expect a positive TA that wasn't funded with concessions around every corner.