Originally Posted by
Brocc15
Seriously? That's a ridiculous question. It is absolutely completely relevant and I don't understand how you could see it otherwise. Many people want to know who voted no and yes because it may affect how they vote in future MEC elections. Also, the fact that there is a split is evidence to many people that this contract was not a "home run" and some from the MEC believed we could have done better
I haven't heard ANYBODY refer to this as a "home run" AS far as the votes prejudicing future MEC voting, you might be right, but for the current items we have before us, who GAS?
"I do one thing at a time, I do it very well, and then I move on"... meatball surgery not required here.