Originally Posted by
flyallnite
I suspect it's for future bargaining bait. The company is probably thinking two contracts ahead of us.
Good point. Just like we need to give up scope to bail the company out on the 300+ CRJ-200s it ordered in C2016 we will need to bail the company out again on the 102 CRJ-700s/E170s by converting all of those to 76 seaters and who in the heck knows if 325 would remain the cap?
At this point, why would it?