View Single Post
Old 05-23-2012 | 04:38 PM
  #100872  
HVYinRESERVE's Avatar
HVYinRESERVE
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: 757/767 FO
Default

Originally Posted by bigdaddie
Let me throw this out to you. I have no inside information or influence but this is just food for thought. Let's say this TA is resubmitted with the following changes, would it be acceptable?

1) Pay rates +12.8% over current rates at DOS, +4% January 1, 2013, +4% January 1, 2014
2) Profit sharing unchanged (current levels, not TA)
3) +2% to DC plan
4) Section 1 unchanged or REAL improvements, no more 70+ seat RJs
5) This is a biggie to me. AMENDMENT DATE 12/31/2014

This would give productivity improvements the company wants and a contract we don't have to swallow for so many years. Since this TA was negotiated in short order, it may behoove both parties to have shorter contracts with quick paced negotiations in this highly dynamic business environment.

BD
I was wondering if an expedited negotiation could happen if we vote no. This seems much more doable and I agree that maybe shorter contracts are better in this environment. I'm not sure about the reserve ALV +15 either, especially if it is mandatory. I haven't quite got my head wrapped around the reserve rules yet and they will definitely affect my QOL!