Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
I am trying to model that language right now, and when I read it, it stuck out to me as something I need to deeply look at. It may be fine, but I agree that the complexity and layering of the ratios, snapshot, and the triggers as the ratios change prior to the snap shot needs to be modeled and looked at.
I tend to think this will be where the contract pays for a good bit of the "improvements." up gauge mentioned but not growing. Subtract a bunch of higher paying larger aircraft for more frequency across the board. That will not wind up looking like a win when it's over I do not think. Each one of these improvements is not in a vacuum. The increased productivity will really reduce the need to hire IMHO. It's in the guise of "well help us flatten out the hiring bubble." I'm listening but still NO at this point I think.