Originally Posted by
LittleBoyBlew
The current situation is somewhat precedent setting I must admit, however this opens the door for further litigation if a Nic cram down occurs. Remember the APA is also bound to DFR east and west. I'm sure they are aware of what may happen if they bring our bar fight on to their banquet hall.
So what do you think carries more of a dfr risk for the apa, following an existing contract they inherit or modifying it to mAke the east minority happy?
P.S. Do you question the absurd amount of evidence the west has of the east and usapa ACTIVELY avoiding the Nic.?