Originally Posted by
LeineLodge
You're still thinking airframes. It's about block hours (pilot jobs).
All I'm asking is that guys take the time to understand what the new section 1 proposal is all about. I was VERY skeptical, but after understanding all the details and asking a ton of questions, I am convinced that our new scope is a huge win.
There are some very strong downside protections and the entire idea is designed to bring flying/jobs back to mainline, and keep them here.
I read it....FTB is right. It is entirely possible to downgauge mainline and create the ratios that are our "protection." I understand block hours but do you really think they are going to just let some airframes sit around doing nothing? They are going to fly the crap out of every piece of metal here just like they should. Domestically it should be pretty close all around. So if I retire 767-300 and fill it's capacity with 737x3daily...I've just helped meet that ratio. Also if I then terminate some of the uneconomical routing to small communities, I further improve the protection ratio. So I want to know where this big movement is going to happen. I've never heard anyone say anything about "growth." We may hire a few prematurely but it will be more to flatten the hiring bubble at mainline. Overall it will be a permanent net loss as we are outsourcing more airframes permanently. If they don't have it, they won't use it. I just wonder how much then new work rules will really reduce the expanded mainline frequency manning requirements. I'm not saying there aren't merits to this TA...it's just that it ain't nearly as rosy as everyone is trying to sell me.