View Single Post
Old 05-26-2012 | 10:54 AM
  #101609  
scambo1's Avatar
scambo1
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
I realize you weren't around when AMR Eagle or Mesa (flying as USAirways Express) operated as DCI carriers, but here's some history. Both of those airlines were owned by companies that had other subsidiaries that operated non-permitted aircraft. None of those subsidiaries with non-permitted aircraft could carry Delta passengers, code or revenue. That's exactly the same with RAH and Frontier. No Delta passengers or revenue can fly on Frontier. As I pointed out in another thread, Delta used RAH operated DCI carriers to compete directly with Frontier. Bedford said his 50 seat DCI flying wasn't profitable, and DCI made Frontier less profitable. Sucks to be Bedford.

Now Bedford's in a circumstance where he can't dump Frontier and he has large debt payments due. What's his path out? What plans has Bedford successfully executed on since he started his branded strategy?

Why would Delta (a founding SkyTeam and its largest member) allow Bedford to take money out of Delta's pockets by flying SkyTeam member code under the SkyTeam banner on its RAH's own branded operation? There's no logic to that position as I see it. Bedford certainly can't fly Delta or Atlantaic JV code with his branded carrier certificate using other than permitted aicraft under our current arrangements.

What am I missing that is causing you concern?

IMO, it furthers the whipsaw, but in the case of RAH, it affects regionals AND mainline equally.

How anyone can possibly defend the RAH carveout, especially a union official, is utterly mindboggling.

It's like saying noone can kick us in the nutz, except johnny.

With your statement (above), am I safe to assume that you favor the US gov't sending welfare payments to Mexicans (living in Mexico) who were once illegal aliens in the US?