Originally Posted by
80ktsClamp
To give them some credit, I highly doubt the 900 has that good of CASM... I remember you and I discussing how unrealistic Bar's CASM numbers were on the plane just by fuel burn alone. Don't forget that on top of that, the regionals fly those things around FAST. They burn the gas flying .80 and don't care. Add on to that redundant management structures and all the other outsourced crap.
I think they want the 900 because a. It continues the outsourcing b. it allows them to open the CPAs to accelerate parking 50 seaters and , c. it is better CASM than the 50 and is still viable in small markets.
It still doesn't change the fact that I believe we allowed way too many additional in this TA. The new 900s are a first class product (they will never have 90 seats... Delta wants first class in as many planes as possible. Doesn't mean they wont ask for 82 or so...), will be around for a long time, and continue the viability of the regionals longer than they would be if left to their own devices to die of a failing business model.
I know. I went crazy on Bar over those numbers. Basically, I had heard enough to believe the 717s were coming. The thought that for no apparent reason they'd be tied to letting DCI have more CRJ-900XXXrs was asinine. I could see the 3:1 ratio kicking in but nothing more. There's no way anybody would be stupid enough to fall for a "
pay me for what I have to give you anyways." That's stupid.
And it still is.
But somehow it became a reality, and that sucks.
So Bar was right, I was wrong. Now what else was Bar right about? CASMs?