Originally Posted by
80ktsClamp
It's not that it's not good a good thing to put some shrinkage toward DCI... but we will continue to see stagnation due to work rule givebacks on this contract and replacement but not growth aircraft. On top of that giving away 70 more mainline replacement aircraft to DCI...
We fell way short of the mark on this TA.
The 70 76 seaters only come if we get all 88 717s. Then a ratio of block hours is set up to ensure no shrinkage of total mainline flights versus DCI. Then park 148 smaller RJs. That sounds good to me.