View Single Post
Old 05-30-2012 | 07:34 AM
  #102387  
sinca3's Avatar
sinca3
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
OK ya'll.. I am done with this. You have obviously made up your mind based on what you are willing to look at and the 76 seats.. You win.. Vote no, and I will cancel out 1 vote.

I will be able to say "I told you so" when this is over.

Bye
T-
I'm junior folk that appreciates everyone's input and ideas. Lately you have gotten hostile with most of your responses and it really harms your arguments.
While I am still a fence sitter (I've gone from HELL NO to maybe to OK and back to NO) I really think you are letting your anger/frustration blind you from what others are trying to say.
While I agree there are some benefits to this TA it all depends on our managements honesty on a handshake. Where has that gotten us the past 25-30 years! There is absolutely nothing to prevent the company from doing a pump and dump with this TA. Yes, there are some protections in the TA from growth and contracting being tied together it still doesn't hide the fact that DCI grows with the one airframe that does the most damage to US.
I guess to end, think bcak to where you were and what equipment were you on when mainline shrunk? Did DCI's growth affect your seat or job progression? What were the long term effect of RJ's to you or your friends at any airline?
These are the facts we are dealing with on the "no" side of the argument. Try and see all sides before you continue to bash people for their opinions. You've said numerous times that "it doesn't affect you", and all that does is show your lack of concern for the ones it does affect!