Originally Posted by
Bucking Bar
Understood Bacon.
I'm generally against economic disincentives which have a prior history of failure during extreme stress. However, the economic assumptions made in this contract TA appear much stronger than similar provisions that I've been critical of.
Could you expound on this? Always find your posts interesting and insightful, and your support of the TA despite additional 76 seaters has been surprising. I'm interested in hearing what you have to say about the above.