Old 05-30-2012 | 04:40 PM
  #32  
DAL73n's Avatar
DAL73n
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
From: 737n/FO
Default

Originally Posted by WideRide
NO, it is not a signing bonus. It is to "offset" the cut they are making to your profit sharing payout.



You are buying into the scare tactics. Good pilot. Fall in line. Put your hat back on, and shine those shoes.

Seriously...the sky is not falling. Both sides are reasonable.

If we send it back, we can get the areas we have issues with refined. Not having a deal is a bad idea for the Company as well - and it is bad for SWA because they are "stuck" with 717's they don't want, and ALPA national (dues), and all those RJ guys at DCI who are like grapes on the vine, withering away...and us (we want pay and we want it now). Don't buy into the Company "all or nothing" line...we can fix scope so it is at least better than the current offer (or maybe we can even hold the line!)...we can increase the pay rates...we can get rid of that 7th short-call day they are adding, we can get rid of the profit sharing cut...

If we all band together and vote NO, we can show our solidarity and the Company will know they have to make us a better offer. The Company needs the lift. They need 717's or 319's. They are stuck with 255 70-76 seat RJ's and the 50 seaters are not viable in this fuel market, refinery or no refinery. We had to accept massive cuts post 9/11. We are working under a concessionary contract right now. We have the upper hand now. Let's use it. Vote NO.

I can't believe how many people are falling for the FUD (Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt). Does anybody believe that the company is willing to throw out months of work if we just ask for modest improvements (a few more percent in pay and some tightening of some language) and the certainty of labor peace (which they need for the capital markets and to get rid of the unprofitable 50s - isn't it amazing that the 1.25/1 is EXACTLY what is need ed to bring over 88 717s (which the company wants because they are cheap). I think the risk (no raises for up to two years) outweighs the rewards (giving up the sure raises with concessions in scope and work rules).