Originally Posted by
forgot to bid
denny i can answer this one right now, the oter i want to show some math.
you say "with this logic, you will never vote in favor of any contract because you don't believe it will be enforced and we will given them relief on anything. If that's the case, why haven't we just bent over backwards and give the company more 76ers now? They clearly want them, what has stopped us from just giving them more under the current contract?"
first, remember section 1 is seperate from 2-28, at least imho. so wins, and losses, in 2-28 have no bearing on 1. make all the advances and hold all the lines elsewhere means nothing if we outsource where it hurts us most.
what i'm saying is if you concede in section 1 where it matters, more jumbo rj's, why should I believe we won't concede on ratios that compare dci bh to mainline (767ER or larger) bh?
Hey Denny, can I use a colorful analogy?
Do you know this joke?
A wealthy man walks into a bar asks a beautiful woman at a bar if he she'd sleep with him for a million dollars. She says yes. Then he says, well, I don't have a million dollars so how about $200? She balks: "What do you think I am, a *****?"
He says, "We've already established that. Now we are just negotiating the price!"
If we give up jumbo RJ scope then we are establishing we're willing to give up other stuff.
Prostitute analogies.