Originally Posted by
Rogue24
Bar, the idea may be revolutionary, but the result is less so. Ratios that with projections still allow mainline to act as an accumulator from 1.76-1 down to 1.59-1. In addition, the company has out language that is not tailored to this specific instance, and as a result is not specific enough for a domestic to domestic comparison.
What I saw in Art's letter; with him being involved in the process was, there was not enough quid for the pro quo. Not that the idea conceived was wrong.
On your first part, that is exactly why I will continue to study this TA and make a decision on how to vote in a few weeks. I listed my concerns over section 1 a few days ago and that has not changed.